As a therapist-in-training, I am often
self-conscious about being younger than my patients expect me to be. I primarily
work with children, so I am always worried that my patients’ parents will doubt
my ability to help them (given that I am still in training and am unmarried and
childless). However, whether being a new therapist results in less improvement for
your patients is an empirical question. Luckily, Dr. Lily Brown from UCLA and
her colleagues from around the country took the time to investigate this issue.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/faeaf/faeaf10dae95caa866d98b3e7cc3b8ce401e78bf" alt=""
They found that adhering to the CBT manual was unrelated to patient improvement. This
is great news for many practicing therapists who believe that strictly following
therapy manuals depersonalizes the therapy experience. However, they did find
that therapists with high competence in CBT had patients whose anxiety improved
the most. They also found that years of experience as a therapist was negatively related to patient
improvement. In other words, the least experienced therapists had the best
patient outcomes. But what does that mean? Taken together with the finding that
more competence in CBT results in better patient outcomes, novice therapists having
better patient outcomes is likely a reflection of these young therapists having
more training in CBT during graduate school and having been through that
training more recently. There are two factors at play here, both doing a
disservice to patients. First, depending on when and where the therapist went
to school, they may have never been trained in CBT at all. Second, many
therapists’ practice evolves over time, usually moving away from the core
components of a therapy’s effectiveness, which is often referred to as
therapist drift.
Regardless of how it happens, the important issue is
how to make sure that you are getting the most effective therapy available.
Unfortunately, most people don’t know how to evaluate the effectiveness of a
therapist. Instead, people choose their therapist based on other factors, such
as convenience and whether they “connect” with or like a therapist. While these
may seem important, the evidence suggests that whether you and your therapist
like each other won’t make a difference in whether your anxiety improves over
time. Just like whether you like your physician won’t impact how effective his prescribed
antibiotics are for your infection. What matters is whether your therapist is
trained in the most effective method of treating what you would like to have
treated, and how well they have maintained those skills since that training. "But Kate, how am I supposed to find out about your therapist’s training?" "Just ask!" Recently,
Harriet Brown of the New York Times wrote an article discussing this very issue
and included some very helpful questions to ask when shopping for a therapist (“Looking
for evidence that therapy works” Click
here to access this article).
It should be noted that this study only
looked at patients with anxiety, so their findings on patient improvement may
not necessarily apply to patients with other psychiatric disorders, such as
depression. However, CBT is still considered the most effective form of talk
therapy for most psychiatric disorders and is certainly the intervention with the most empirical support to date. It is also important to keep
in mind that anxiety symptoms were the only outcome measure in the study, even
though people go to therapy for many reasons. It is very likely that while more
experienced therapists had poorer anxiety outcomes over time, their patients
improved in other areas, like self-esteem or relationship quality, which cannot
be discounted as long as these gains are what the patient wanted. The problem
arises when patients are interested in treating their anxiety, which never
improves as a consequence of limitations to the therapists’ skills. Every
patient should be able to choose what they spend their time and money on in
therapy, and we all deserve to be well-informed when making that choice.
Excellent article, Kate! I have a niece who has had very poor results with therapists and is in dire need of a good one for her anxiety disorders. I am going to discuss this with her.
ReplyDeleteMarie Copeland
Unfortunately, that is likely the case for many people who eventually give up hope and believe that "therapy" just doesn't work for them. I hope this helps your niece and many other people make better informed decisions about how anxiety can be very effectively treated.
ReplyDeleteIs comparing a therapists treatment methods and a doctor's anitbiotics prescriptions an appropriate analogy? It seems one is based on theory and practices still be researched, while the other is based on chemistry and data collected with objective outcomes. Maybe I am ignorant to the subject, but I thought a therapist's treatment methods are catered to what the therapist is able to do best. From that standpoint, the patient decides if what the therapist does best is going to help them prior to, or early on in therapy. Again, I may not be educated enough on the topic, but I'd love to learn.
ReplyDeleteP.S. I miss you!
Jon Farm
Hey Jon, I appreciate the comment. The question of whether the therapist-physician analogy is appropriate is really based on your perception of mental illness as a disease or not. Outside of the analogy, the study I review here very specifically speaks of individuals who sought treatment for diagnosed anxiety disorders, and the study examined what predicted their symptoms of anxiety alleviating over time. The finding is very clear that therapists who were competent in CBT skills had patients whose presenting problem got better over time. The trouble is that many people with anxiety are not as educated about what treatments are most effective for their disorder and end up staying with a therapist regardless of their symptoms improving. This, again using the questionable analogy, would be the equivalent of a physician treating an infection with fish oil pills instead of antibiotics because they are an expert on fish oil remedies. Most people, due to popular media, would be able to make an educated decision about whether that doctor was the right fit for them, but with psychiatric illnesses, people are less informed about what treatments have been tested and have evidence that they are effective. So this article tries to disseminate that message.
ReplyDeleteBut if competence is defined as having more training during grad school and,I assume, that training does not really require adherence to CBT manual (otherwise the young therapists naturally would follow the manual) then “more training” of inexperienced therapists should be equivalent to “more experience” of seasoned therapists. Please help me figure out this catch 22.
ReplyDeleteAlso, if more experienced therapists had poorer anxiety outcome but their patients improved in other areas – maybe the CBT manual for treating anxiety is the problem?
I think I see where the confusion is here. Training was never measured in this study, only competence in CBT, adherence to the CBT protocol and patient anxiety symptoms. Competence in CBT was assessed by training researchers watching and coding more than a thousand hours of therapy sessions. The interpretation of their findings was where training came up. Specifically, that more experienced therapists were likely further away from their training which likely explained why more experienced therapists were less likely to have patients improve in their anxiety symptoms. So yes, you would hope that more training for inexperienced therapists would equate to years of training, but the results show that this is not true. Being competent in the core principles and skills of CBT has better patient outcomes while being an experienced therapist didn't.
ReplyDeleteAs for the second comment. It is entirely possible that the CBT manual is in some ways a problem. Some people have criticized manualized treatments as being too narrow for example. However, these manualized treatments are the most effective way of treating anxiety disorders like these people have. So again, the question is whether that is also the priority for the patient. A very interesting follow-up study for this would be to subjectively ask patients what their main goal in therapy. Your point would be very valid if the patients reported that they wanted to improve in an area outside of their anxiety.